← Search

Magmatic inclusions in rhyolites, contaminated basalts, and compositional zonation beneath the Coso volcanic field, California

Bacon, Charles R.; Metz, Jenny (1984) Magmatic inclusions in rhyolites, contaminated basalts, and compositional zonation beneath the Coso volcanic field, California. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, vol.85, no.4, pp.346-365, Apr 1984

AuthorsBacon, Charles R.; Metz, Jenny
Year1984
TitleMagmatic inclusions in rhyolites, contaminated basalts, and compositional zonation beneath the Coso volcanic field, California
SourceContributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, vol.85, no.4, pp.346-365, Apr 1984
PublisherSpringer International, Heidelberg-New York, International III
ISSN0010-7999
GeoRef1984-052293
Keywordsandesites; basalts; California; Cenozoic; chain silicates; chemical composition; composition; Coso volcanic field; differentiation; eruptions; fractional crystallization; Garlock Fault; igneous rocks; inclusions; lava; mafic composition; magmas; Owens Valley; petrology; pillow lava; Pleistocene; pyroxene group; Quaternary; rhyolites; silicates; southeastern California; textures; United States; vesicular texture; volcanic rocks; volcanism; volcanology; xenoliths; zoning
DOI10.1007/BF01150292

Abstract

Compositional variation among these basalts can be ascribed to crystal fractionation. Erupted volumes of these basalts decrease with increasing differentiation. Mafic lavas containing up to 58% SiO sub 2 , erupted adjacent to the rhyolite field, formed by mixing of basaltic and silicic magma. Basaltic magma interacted with crustal rocks to form other SiO sub 2 -rich mafic lavas erupted near the Sierra Nevada fault zone. Several rhyolite domes in the Coso volcanic field contain sparse andesitic inclusions 55-61% SiO sub 2 . Pillow-like forms, intricate commingling and local diffusive mixing of andesite and rhyolite at contacts, concentric vesicle distribution, and crystal morphologies indicative of undercooling show that inclusions were incorporated in their rhyolitic hosts as blobs of magma. Inclusions were probably dispersed throughout small volumes of rhyolitic magma by convective mechanical mixing. Inclusion magma was formed by mixing hybridization at the interface between basaltic and rhyolitic magmas that coexisted in vertically zoned igneous systems. Relict phenocrysts and the bulk compositions of inclusions suggest that silicic endmembers were less differentiated than erupted high-silica rhyolite. Changes in inferred endmembers of magma mixtures with time suggests that the steepness of chemical gradients near the silicic/mafic interface in the zoned reservoir may have decreased as the system matured, although a high-silica rhyolitic cap persisted. The Coso example is an extreme case of large thermal and compositional contrast between inclusion and host magmas; lesser differences between intermediate composition magmas and inclusions lead to undercooling phenomena that suggest smaller Delta T.--Modified journal abstract.

24 samples from this reference

SampleRock nameMajorTraceIsotope
105-2Basalt yesyes
106-5Basalt yesyes
83-3Basalt yes
72-3Alkali basalt yes
105-5Alkali basalt yesyes
71-2Alkali basalt yes
84-1Alkali basalt yesyes
104-13Alkali basalt yesyes
9/6/2001Alkali basalt yes
84-4Basalt yesyes
8-DecRhyolite yesyes
5-DecRhyolite yesyes
7-DecRhyolite yesyes
1-DecRhyolite yesyes
83-1Basalt yesyes
28-7 yesyes
28-11 yesyes
28-6 yesyes
28-5 yesyes
84-7Basalt yesyes
71-1Alkali basalt yes
104-8Alkali basalt yesyes
83-7Alkali basalt yes
9/6/2009Alkali basalt yesyes