Subduction style magmatism in a non-subduction setting; the Colvilleigneous complex, NE Washington State, USA
Morris, George A; Larson, Peter B; Hooper, Peter R (2000) Subduction style magmatism in a non-subduction setting; the Colvilleigneous complex, NE Washington State, USA. Journal of Petrology, vol.41, no.1, pp.43-67, Jan 2000
| Authors | Morris, George A; Larson, Peter B; Hooper, Peter R |
|---|---|
| Year | 2000 |
| Title | Subduction style magmatism in a non-subduction setting; the Colvilleigneous complex, NE Washington State, USA |
| Source | Journal of Petrology, vol.41, no.1, pp.43-67, Jan 2000 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (GBR) |
| ISSN | 0022-3530 |
| GeoRef | 2001-071208 |
| Keywords | andesites; Cenozoic; Colville Complex; dacites; Eocene; igneous rocks;Klondike Mountain Formation; magmatism; Paleogene; rhyolites; SanpoilVolcanic Formation; Stevens County Washington; subduction zones;Tertiary; United States; volcanic rocks; Washington |
| DOI | 10.1093/petrology/41.1.43 |
Abstract
The Colville Igneous Complex is located within the Eocene MagmaticBelt of the North American Cordilleran interior. It straddles theUS-Canadian border in northeast Washington and southern BritishColumbia. The complex consists of three intrusive and two extrusivephases, the first extrusive phase being contemporaneous with thelatter two intrusive phases. As a consequence of subsolidusre-equilibration in the plutonic rocks, this study concentrates on thetwo, extrusive phases, the Sanpoil Volcanic Formation and the KlondikeMountain Formation. The Sanpoil Volcanic Formation consists ofandesites, dacites and rare trachyandesites (SiO (sub 2) = 55-70 wt %)exhibiting a slight decrease in total alkalis (Na (sub 2) O+K (sub 2)O) with increasing silica. The Klondike Mountain Formation consists ofbasalts, basaltic andesites, andesites, dacites and rhyolites (SiO(sub 2) = 51-75 wt %) with total alkalis increasing with increasingsilica. The calc-alkaline affinity of the rocks of the ColvilleIgneous Complex, coupled with the presence of a ""subduction signature""of enriched large ion lithophile elements (LILE) and depleted highfield strength elements (HFSE), has traditionally been attributed topetrogenesis in a subduction-related magmatic arc, the Challis Arc.New trace and rare earth element and isotopic data ( (super 87) Sr/(super 86) Sr (sub i) delta (super 18) O), however, suggest that thisexplanation is no longer tenable. We propose that the magmas of theSanpoil Volcanic Formation were generated by mid-crustal partialmelting of a mid-Proterozoic source and that the Klondike MountainFormation was formed by varying degrees of mixing between two distinctlate-Proterozoic lower-crustal sourced magmas and a mantle-derivedmagma. In all cases, the subduction or calc-alkaline signature wasinherited from the Proterozoic crustal sources. The only magmas thatcan confidently be attributed to a mantle source are the basalts ofthe Klondike Mountain Formation, which show no decoupling of the LILEand HFSE, i.e. no subduction signature, precluding the presence of asubduction slab beneath this part of the North American Cordilleraduring the Eocene. We propose the alternative model: that the ColvilleIgneous Complex formed as a result of decompression melting of crustand mantle during post-Laramide orogenic collapse of an overthickenedcrust.
58 samples from this reference
| Sample | Rock name | Major | Trace | Isotope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAM 93 100A | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 098Lt | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 099 | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 92 015 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 92 030 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 098Dk | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 92 024 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 046 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 061 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 071 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 048 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 070 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 044 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 072 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 94 016 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 94 020 | Trachyandesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 096 | Trachyandesite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 94 019 | Trachyandesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 097 | Trachyandesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 097Dk | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 94 017 | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 94 018 | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 100 | Andesite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 122 | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 94 023 | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 029 | Andesite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 94 026 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 102 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 063 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 123 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 94 028 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 064 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 101 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 093Md | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 093Lt | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| LW MD-24 | Basalt | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 94 25 | Basaltic-andesite | yes | yes | |
| LW KM-64 | Basaltic-andesite | yes | yes | yes |
| LW KM-84 | Basaltic-andesite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 118 | Basaltic-andesite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 120 | Andesite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 92 034 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 92 34B | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 121 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 116 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 119 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 115 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 124 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 045 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 02 022 | Dacite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 92 018 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 92 021 | Dacite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 92 033 | Rhyolite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 121DK | Rhyolite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 078 | Rhyolite | yes | yes | |
| GAM 93 079 | Rhyolite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 125 | Rhyolite | yes | yes | yes |
| GAM 93 083 | Rhyolite | yes | yes |