← Search

Petrogenesis of Pre-caldera mafic lavas, Jemez Mountains volcanic field

Wolff, J.A.; Rowe, M.C.; Teasdale, R.; Gardner, J.N.; Ramos, F.C.; Heikoop, C.E. (2005) Petrogenesis of Pre-caldera mafic lavas, Jemez Mountains volcanic field. Journal of Petrology, vol.46, no.2, pp.407-439, Sept 2005

AuthorsWolff, J.A.; Rowe, M.C.; Teasdale, R.; Gardner, J.N.; Ramos, F.C.; Heikoop, C.E.
Year2005
TitlePetrogenesis of Pre-caldera mafic lavas, Jemez Mountains volcanic field
SourceJournal of Petrology, vol.46, no.2, pp.407-439, Sept 2005
ISSN0022-3530
GeoRef2005-047432
Keywordsassimilation, Cenozoic, depletion, Jemez Lineament, Jemez Mountains, Jemez Mountains volcanic field, lava, mafic composition, magma contamination, magmas, Miocene, Neogene, New Mexico, partial melting, Quaternary, Rio Grande, Tertiary, United States, Valles Caldera

Abstract

The Miocene-Quaternary Jemez Mountains volcanic field (JMVF), the site of the Valles caldera, lies at the intersection of the Jemez lineament, a Proterozoic suture, and the Cenozoic Rio Grande rift. Parental magmas are of two types: K-depleted silica-undersaturated, derived from the partial melting of lithospheric mantle with residual amphibole, and tholeiitic, derived from either asthenospheric or lithospheric mantle. Variability in silica-undersaturated basalts reflects contributions of melts derived from lherzolitic and pyroxenitic mantle, representing heterogeneous lithosphere associated with the suture. The K depletion is inherited by fractionated, crustally contaminated derivatives (hawaiites and mugearites), leading to distinctive incompatible trace element signatures, with Th/(Nb,Ta) and La/(Nb,Ta) greater than, but K/(Nb,Ta) similar to, Bulk Silicate Earth. These compositions dominate the mafic and intermediate lavas, and the JMVF is therefore derived largely, and perhaps entirely, from melting of fertile continental Jemez lineament lithosphere during rift-related extension. Significant variations in Pb and Nd isotope ratios ( (super 206) Pb/ (super 204) Pb = 17.20-18.93; (super 143) Nd/ (super 144) Nd = 0.51244-0.51272) result from crustal contamination, whereas 87Sr/86Sr is low and relatively uniform (0.7040-0.7048). We compare the effects of contamination by low- (super 87) Sr/ (super 86) Sr crust with assimilation of high- (super 87) Sr/ (super 86) Sr granitoid by partial melting, with Sr retained in a feldspathic residue. Both models satisfactorily reproduce the isotopic features of the rocks, but the lack of a measurable Eu anomaly in most JMVF mafic lavas is difficult to reconcile with a major role for residual plagioclase during petrogenesis.

41 samples from this reference

SampleRock nameMajorTraceIsotope
JM93141Nephelinite yesyes
JM03-9ATholeiite yesyes
JM93137-Mugearite yesyes
JM93176Tholeiite yesyesyes
JM93135ABasalt yesyesyes
JM93252Hawaiite yesyesyes
JM93198Tholeiite yesyesyes
JM93232Mugearite yesyesyes
JM9350-2Mugearite yesyesyes
JM93233Mugearite yesyesyes
JM9325Benmoreite yesyesyes
JM93262Benmoreite yesyesyes
JM93125Benmoreite yesyesyes
MR0047Mugearite yesyes
MR0013Mugearite yesyesyes
MR0076Benmoreite yesyesyes
JW001-1Tholeiite yesyes
JW144-4Tholeiite yesyes
JW144-10Basalt yesyes
JW144-12Basalt yesyes
JW144-16Alkali basalt yesyes
JW144-20Basalt yesyes
JW238-1Basalt yesyes
MR00-9Basalt yesyesyes
MR00-7Mugearite yesyesyes
SF-1Hawaiite yesyes
SF-9Hawaiite yesyes
O-1Hawaiite yesyes
PLAlkali basalt yesyes
I-6Alkali basalt yesyesyes
I-3Hawaiite yesyes
H-0Mugearite yesyes
SF-3Mugearite yesyesyes
I-5Mugearite yesyesyes
WR1Tholeiite yesyes
EA3Tholeiite yesyes
EA4Mugearite yesyes
EA6Tholeiite yesyes
EA8Mugearite yesyes
EA9Mugearite yesyes
EA11Tholeiite yesyes